Modding is a process
by JJ Abrams & a whole lot of people!
Published on May 5, 2009 By Zyxpsilon In Everything Else

SPOILERS ALERT;

 

You will see this film eventually, right?

You will even have the urge to share your opinions with the membership here, and to express yourselves clearly with description of scenes, quoting dialogues, snapping images of the new NCC-1701, etc!

Be fair & square, and consider that anything you will write below should automatically spoil the fun & the mystery for others.

Tomorrow at this time, France-Belgium-Switzerland-Vulcan(Alberta) fans will rush out their TRUE world premieres as much as some lucky Austin_Texas & Sydney_Australia people last April who resisted (However futile!) revealing any details after being asked by Orci, Kurtzman, Lindelof & Mr Leonard Nimoy.

Do not read anything below while you still can exit this thread.

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

Long enough to fill a browser page?

STAR TREK is a contest of skills & personalities.

It proves (again) that Humanity can and MUST go to Space and beyond.

And, that even Science is no match for Fiction.

The Galaxy is our only hope.

Enjoy.

 


Comments (Page 7)
15 PagesFirst 5 6 7 8 9  Last
on May 13, 2009

Trust the most reliable source around the Linking neighborhoods for pure interpretation of facts rather than opinions for yourselves if you sooooo wish; Memory-Alpha.

on May 13, 2009

Stray too far away from this thread topic once more and i'll have to ask for moderators either to give a much more complex Report button or to lock it for everyone else... which constitutes your last warning.

Who are you talking to, exactly?

Thanks for the link.

on May 13, 2009

Robert April's role as the first captain of the Enterprise is debatable. He is only mentioned in the animated series. Paramount and Gene Roddenberry simply decided not to consider the animated series for Star Trek continuity. That being said, it would be more of an error, if the movie actually mentioned Robert April as the first captain.
---Spooky

Toward the end of his life, Roddenberry, and Trek writer DC Fontana, both urged the acceptance of the Animated Series into the canon. In fact, Fontana once mentioned that, it you added the two years of the cartoon to the three of TOS, it gave you Kirk's entire 5-year mission. April is included in the official Star Trek Chronology, by Michael and Denise Okuda, as well as on the memory Alpha link I just received from our host. 

Over the years, fans have generally accepted that April was the first captain. Again, this would have been before the events of the new movie.

And, I'm not afraid of change, I just don't like it very much.

on May 13, 2009

I thnk you. Maybe me and the other "gay guys", it's hard to tell with Zyxpsilon. I for one think you are perfectly on topic.

on May 13, 2009

I miss Vulcan

on May 13, 2009

Scoutdog
I thnk you. Maybe me and the other "gay guys", it's hard to tell with Zyxpsilon. I for one think you are perfectly on topic.

I thought so, too......?

I just thought of another error they made; Delta Vega (the planet on which Gary Mitchell would be killed) is no where near Vulcan. Yet, there was Spock, standing on the its icy surface (it wasn't icy in the TV show, by the by) watching Vulcan implode and disappear into the black hole.

Man! They just keep racking up and racking up!

on May 13, 2009

 

Rightwinger

I should point out that the idea that lasers are less advanced than phase weapons is your own idea. I never really liked the lasers in The Cage anyway, but I can accept them as a stepping stone between basic beam weaponry (phase pistols) and more advanced ones (phasers). All three techs could be very similar, just with different nomenclature (speaking GalCiv-ish, they'd be Laser I, Laser II, and Laser III).--Minor race


That's not what I'm saying; they had "phase weapons" in "Enterprise", which took place 150 years before Kirk's time, but lasers in "The Cage", which took place only a few years before. That bugs me. As to the Romulans, you're correct. I doff my cap.

They really do need to hire some Trek canon inspectors on these shows and movies, to ensure continuity.

But you are saying that phase weapons = phasers. That's never been said anywhere. I was trying to illustrate the point that "phase weapons" could have been a technology that evolved into "lasers", which then evolved into "phasers". The assumption being made is "phase weapons" and "phasers" are more advanced than "lasers".

I personally don't like the mention of lasers at all, and I would be happy to cut them out entirely. Just like they say in The Cage that "the time barrier has been breached", implying ships travel through time, they use some sort of bizarre galactic measurement that implies the Federation is galaxy-wide... I don't take these seriously. Do you?

 

The only worry I have with the new movie is that we won't return to the main universe for some time, especially because at least 2 sequels are lined up (according to Memory Alpha) using the same crew + ship. Sure, it might spark interest in a main universe series (especially with the major success of the movie), but I'm a little worried all that excitement is for "Abrams' Universe", not the "Prime Universe."

on May 13, 2009

Who are you talking to, exactly?

EviliroN for *insisting* on the gay craptalk.

on May 13, 2009

In fact, Fontana once mentioned that, it you added the two years of the cartoon to the three of TOS, it gave you Kirk's entire 5-year mission.

If this iteration of TOS ever makes it to TeeVee, i'll put my entire collection of DVDs on the line that the first episode will pick from exactly where Turnabout Intruder left off.

on May 13, 2009

Lets not be TOO hard on the guy. He said he just wanted to see how the rest of use would react.

on May 13, 2009

It's a good movie. Kinda fast paced, though, I think in a couple of spots they should have slowed things down a bit. I want to have a nice long look at that new bridge .

I'm not quite understanding this new audience . . .

When the new Knight Rider came out, I had hopes that it would be good - but after the first few episodes aired, I basically turned it off. I can't really put a finger on what I didn't like - but it seemed rather directionless and without focus. Too much chattering of the minor characters, not enough substance. I hope that if a new Star Trek TV show comes out, it won't be like the new Knight Rider.

I think it's pretty obvious this is gonna be a reboot - they did mention that all of this time travel stuff drastically altered events. I'm pretty sure this means a new TV show.

. . . and to those of you complaining about the long distance teleport: He wouldn't be Scotty if he didn't do the occasional miracle.

on May 14, 2009

But you are saying that phase weapons = phasers. That's never been said anywhere. I was trying to illustrate the point that "phase weapons" could have been a technology that evolved into "lasers", which then evolved into "phasers". The assumption being made is "phase weapons" and "phasers" are more advanced than "lasers".

I personally don't like the mention of lasers at all, and I would be happy to cut them out entirely. Just like they say in The Cage that "the time barrier has been breached", implying ships travel through time, they use some sort of bizarre galactic measurement that implies the Federation is galaxy-wide... I don't take these seriously. Do you?
---Minor race

But "The Cage" was the prototype; before so many changes were made. Of course it's going to be different. It was before the Gene Coon era; Coon created so many of the things that Trek became. It was also before they got a little more concerned with actual science; for example, "dilithium crystals", in the  very beginning, were "lithium crystals". Of course, lithium actually exists, so they changed it. Same with laser/phasers.

You're saying that "Phase Weapons", or "Phase Pistols", to which they're often referred, became lasers, which bacame, in turn, "Phasers"? No, I don't buy that. Did the abbacus become the adding machine, which became the abbacus? Even though this is just a TV show, some logical progression has always been implied, and prevailed.

This implication is clearly shown throughout the series by the writers/producers, right down to the dual-nacelle design of the Phoenix, Zephram Cochrane's first warp ship in "First Contact"---32 years after "The Cage" was produced.

on May 14, 2009

okay, i was far too lazy to read through the whole thread, but i just wanted to add one little thing that a lot of people here seemd to got wrong (excuse me if it already has been discussed):

there is no need to patch up the timeline or anyting after this movie - the idead was, that the romulan ship going through the black hole created an alternate timeline, i.e. it runs parallel to the original star trek timeline. this isnt made up by me, but has been explained by j.j. abrams and is backed by the old spock in the movie.

he/they did this, so that they could reboot the genre without alienating all the fans by tossing aside the well-loved and already established content. that is also the reason why nero doesnt simply wait a little bit longer (little bit in context of already waiting 25 years) in order to safe romulus - because in his own timeline, everyone is already dead

on May 14, 2009

Understood. But question:

How do you reboot the franchise and wipe out the entire 43-year continuity of five entire series of hundreds of episodes and ten movies (not to mention the thousands of books), without "alienating all the fans by tossing aside the well-loved and already established content"? You can't.

They did that, though, and I think that in the next movie, they'll need to go back and patch up the timeline, so that it falls back into continuity with the "real" Trek universe.

They also need to get a writer/writers and a director who respects the show itself, not to mention the enormous fan base he's playing to.

on May 14, 2009

Rightwinger
How do you reboot the franchise and wipe out the entire 43-year continuity of five entire series of hundreds of episodes and ten movies (not to mention the thousands of books), without "alienating all the fans by tossing aside the well-loved and already established content"? You can't.
I wasn't alienated (yet).

15 PagesFirst 5 6 7 8 9  Last